- Thu May 20, 2010 9:49 am
#101449
Well, most people that have more specific requirements (such as 6 degrees of freedom) would just get to breakout boards and read them separately.
Where electronics enthusiasts find answers.
Aggrav8d wrote:It just doesn't have what I need....It's a fine board and I'm sure the UAV people love it to bits. Even they must realize they need a magnometer along with their gyros so that they can combine it with a GPS breakout for navigation.What part of "and HMC5843 (triple-axis magnetometer)" fails to indicate that it has a magnetometer? Is the problem, perhaps, that you've been searching for "magnometer" instead of "magnetometer"?
Aggrav8d wrote:I'm naively surprised more people haven't requested this feature.I think "naively" may be a bit of an understatement.
SFE-TS-Robert wrote:VERY cool. Great job. Any more details about this?Thank you. Details (report, source code ect.) on the sensor fusion algorithm are available here: http://code.google.com/p/imumargalgorithm30042010sohm/
Aggrav8d wrote:...I need that more than I need accelerometers.I am assuming you wish to stabilise angular position. You will need both accelerometers and gyroscopes need both to obtain an absolute measurement of angular position (attitude). That is unless you have an alternative reference measurement of angular position (?).
Aggrav8d wrote:Even they must realize they need a magnometer along with their gyros so that they can combine it with a GPS breakout for navigation.I've been rattling my brains trying to think of an application which would only demand gyro and magnetometer... The benefit of fusing magnetometer data with gyro data is to compensate for brief periods of soft-iron distortion and to increase the dynamic accuracy of measurements of the earth’s flux. But then, any practical application would probably require ‘tilt compensation’ and so incorporate an accelerometer.
I'm naively surprised more people haven't requested this feature.