- Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:10 pm
#168003
ATX connectors are fine for the current required and IDC headers can be found to make it easier to make the cables.
Although I would question why you are increasing the cost of the board by using double sided placement and silkscreens?
Is it to be manufactured as a product? If it is it will require 2 x solder paste screen, 2 x placement setups - 2x runs through the placement machine and the PCB is costing more.
Or is it just a one off?
IMO All the res/caps on the underside can be fitted on top side leaving only the ATX connector - is there a reason why it is on the other side?
IF manufactured are you expecting to use optical inspection to test this? If so then those sets of 3 pads that have the big track through them will appear as a short and will require separately programming in to indicate they are not, it is common practice to route out of individual pads before joining them together. If not then never mind.
How are these transistors switching 2A? I only see 2 connections on them? Are you using via in pad ? (more unnecessary cost.)
Or have you a considerable current coming out of the ic's to the transistors? (I cant see your schematic as I dont have eagle).
If so then the IC's would be better closer to the transistors.
You still have plenty of acid traps that can easily be done away with.
EDIT: OK I have eagle now - and although I am no expert at driving it - I cannot see connections to ground on the transistors or capacitors etc?
Is this some hidden connection in Eagle?
Although I would question why you are increasing the cost of the board by using double sided placement and silkscreens?
Is it to be manufactured as a product? If it is it will require 2 x solder paste screen, 2 x placement setups - 2x runs through the placement machine and the PCB is costing more.
Or is it just a one off?
IMO All the res/caps on the underside can be fitted on top side leaving only the ATX connector - is there a reason why it is on the other side?
IF manufactured are you expecting to use optical inspection to test this? If so then those sets of 3 pads that have the big track through them will appear as a short and will require separately programming in to indicate they are not, it is common practice to route out of individual pads before joining them together. If not then never mind.
How are these transistors switching 2A? I only see 2 connections on them? Are you using via in pad ? (more unnecessary cost.)
Or have you a considerable current coming out of the ic's to the transistors? (I cant see your schematic as I dont have eagle).
If so then the IC's would be better closer to the transistors.
You still have plenty of acid traps that can easily be done away with.
EDIT: OK I have eagle now - and although I am no expert at driving it - I cannot see connections to ground on the transistors or capacitors etc?
Is this some hidden connection in Eagle?