This is what I see in my outptu CAM viewer:
The bottom layer isn't terribly complex for me, but does contain a fair number of polygons compared to the standard back side pour. The project in question though is less complex than some others on BatchPCB, which is why I'm still working with support to figure out why it's failing. Oddly enough, the output of the bot looks like this, and GC-Preview agrees:
Note the 13 missing traces.
The package I use is Altium Designer (summer 08 release), a high level industrial grade ECAD package used for serious design work. I push out hundreds of boards a year to board houses without any issues at all, so I know the files are good. I'm just trying to figure out why some of the most common reference tools can't interpret the files correctly.
This is not a sig. This is a duck. Quack.